I just heard on the Thom Hartmann show that Senator Lieberman has second thoughts* about a filibuster. I called Senator Reid,(the Majority Leader's office) to commend him for whatever influence he may have had in correcting the matter. I also noted my support for a strong public option, even though I side with the administration's position that it not be a sticking point for progress.
i.e. there are three particulars that sort out the choices which I will not go into great detail: medicare like, exchange like, what Congress has. Not to mention state options, single payers or opt-outs
[*(All links anachronisically inserted**) the reports of second thoughts may have been greatly exaggerated: does that make them third thoughts or just under reported?]
** the proper disorder is TPM, The Hill and National Review. Oh, now I get it.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query give em harry. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query give em harry. Sort by date Show all posts
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
Wednesday, January 04, 2012
I Ron Knee Chef
Ctrl F Kitchen
Obama Takes it to the Kitchen.
OK, Lawrence O'Donnell is not there yet.[*]
True Man Label: Bring it On.
* 1-5-11 Lawrence O'Donnell: McCain Courage, Mormon Cult(ure) and perfect family. (Mitt Romney)
Recess appointment is perfect politics. Make our** day. (not to get Harry) i.e. take it to court or the people
Is Obama the 75% man? Mitt may be politically perfect, or the least of how many evils?
Trump wanted some enthusiasm, but who am I to be enthused by the choice of an even weaker candidate to face Obama? I hope the Republicans give us their best. It is a process that just might do that. Unfortunately their best for some Republicans, Libertarians, and farther wrongs would be worse for the country. A flip-flopping un-nuanced Romney is their best shot. Someone more extreme*** would be better for the race and the country by allowing Obama to carry the middle left.
** dirty Truman and his spatula
[Later The Daily Caller and Neo-Nuanced R's. ]
*** link added (**also & Neo)
[Neo-Bush, Frank/Dodd and Obamanomics.]
[Rachel Maddow, Star Chamber]
[Ed Schultz, Randi Rhodes, Thom Hartmann, Lawrence O'Donnell]
1-6-11 Paul Harvey, The Rest of the Story. "not really".
Jobs-check, Cuts-check, debt next, but that means revenue also. As for certainty?
Note: use of punctuation, (sic)/pun, "air quotes" or lack of... c-BTW/irony.
(Ctrl F: "best" link inserted above)
[Rachel Maddow follow up or vise verse us ? Steele and Obama!]
[Santorum: Civil ad cert'em, a lesson in logic and taking the 9th.]
[Lawrence O'Donnell follow-up and tetra heed run ! (c-1-5 "courage":It was noted that it would be a lack of courage for McCain not to endorse a Republican candidate at this late date. So he endorses after the first delegates have been selected? Typical fear of fear monger.)]
BTW: China Or Germany? Which Economy Stupid? This proves you can learn from others, but it doesn't say what.
Awkward Breaking(BTW/Less Embedded)News(Ein, Ein, Ayn?)
i.e. next post/segue!
Speaking of Newt Eyed Peas, what he said to the NAACP.
Just demand jobs instead of food stamps? Not to be snarky.
< previous post >
Obama Takes it to the Kitchen.
OK, Lawrence O'Donnell is not there yet.[*]
True Man Label: Bring it On.
* 1-5-11 Lawrence O'Donnell: McCain Courage, Mormon Cult(ure) and perfect family. (Mitt Romney)
Recess appointment is perfect politics. Make our** day. (not to get Harry) i.e. take it to court or the people
Is Obama the 75% man? Mitt may be politically perfect, or the least of how many evils?
Trump wanted some enthusiasm, but who am I to be enthused by the choice of an even weaker candidate to face Obama? I hope the Republicans give us their best. It is a process that just might do that. Unfortunately their best for some Republicans, Libertarians, and farther wrongs would be worse for the country. A flip-flopping un-nuanced Romney is their best shot. Someone more extreme*** would be better for the race and the country by allowing Obama to carry the middle left.
** dirty Truman and his spatula
[Later The Daily Caller and Neo-Nuanced R's. ]
*** link added (**also & Neo)
[Neo-Bush, Frank/Dodd and Obamanomics.]
[Rachel Maddow, Star Chamber]
[Ed Schultz, Randi Rhodes, Thom Hartmann, Lawrence O'Donnell]
1-6-11 Paul Harvey, The Rest of the Story. "not really".
Jobs-check, Cuts-check, debt next, but that means revenue also. As for certainty?
Note: use of punctuation, (sic)/pun, "air quotes" or lack of... c-BTW/irony.
(Ctrl F: "best" link inserted above)
[Rachel Maddow follow up or vise verse us ? Steele and Obama!]
[Santorum: Civil ad cert'em, a lesson in logic and taking the 9th.]
[Lawrence O'Donnell follow-up and tetra heed run ! (c-1-5 "courage":It was noted that it would be a lack of courage for McCain not to endorse a Republican candidate at this late date. So he endorses after the first delegates have been selected? Typical fear of fear monger.)]
BTW: China Or Germany? Which Economy Stupid? This proves you can learn from others, but it doesn't say what.
Awkward Breaking(BTW/Less Embedded)News(Ein, Ein, Ayn?)
i.e. next post/segue!
Speaking of Newt Eyed Peas, what he said to the NAACP.
Just demand jobs instead of food stamps? Not to be snarky.
< previous post >
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)